Knix is a leading Canadian brand known for its menstrual and incontinence underwear. Unfortunately, it has found itself embroiled in a class-action lawsuit in the United States.
The lawsuit alleges that Knix marketed its products as free from harmful PFAS. However, independent lab tests revealed the presence of these chemicals in Knix’s products.
It is stated that the deadline for submitting claim forms, March 11, 2024, has now passed. In this article, we will discuss the details of the Knix lawsuit. We will also examine customer reviews regarding the Knix brand and much more. So, let’s begin.
Sustainable Period Underwear
Washable, reusable period underwear offers a more environmentally sustainable option for dealing with menstruation, but deciding which product is best—and why—can be challenging.
Knix is a popular Canadian brand of menstrual and incontinence underwear. This company has faced a class-action lawsuit in the U.S. The lawsuit alleges that Knix products contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
It is a class of synthetic chemicals. Similarly, Thinx, an American brand with comparable products, has faced two separate PFAS-related lawsuits.
PFAS and their Effects
You might be asking what PFAS is and why it’s such a big topic. They actually represent a large class of man-made chemicals used in consumer products for over 50 years. Furthermore, they are known for their resistance to heat, oil, grease, water, and stains.
In addition, they are referred to as “forever chemicals.” This is because they do not degrade naturally and can accumulate in the environment and human tissue.
High levels of PFAS exposure have been linked to negative health effects. It includes cancer and pregnancy complications
Knix Lawsuit
Bloomberg Law stated that two California consumers filed a lawsuit against Knix. They claimed the brand’s marketing claims misled them about being PFAS-free. Furthermore, they cited independent lab testing that found PFAS in Knix products.
As a response, Knix has filed a motion to dismiss. They argue that the claims are baseless. Moreover, Knix states that they have been transparent about their ongoing testing for PFAS.
Thinx also faced a class-action lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that its products contain harmful chemicals, despite being marketed as safe and sustainable.
Subsequently, The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York approved the settlement. This settlement includes up to $5 million for consumer reimbursement. Furthermore, Thinx is committed to ensuring PFAS are not intentionally added to their products.
Classaction mentioned that Thix has also faced a separate lawsuit in Massachusetts in 2021. According to the lawsuit, some customers experience irregular menstrual cycles. Others have urinary tract infections. Still, others deal with yeast infections. Some face thyroid issues. However, a few have unexplained infertility
Transparency in PFAS-Containing Period Products and Health Risks
The issue of PFAS in period products has raised concerns about health risks. Exposure to these chemicals through clothing is particularly worrying. The health risk from wearing PFAS-containing period underwear is considered low.
However, skin absorption has prompted increased scrutiny, particularly in sensitive areas. Consequently, there is a growing consumer demand for transparency.
Consumers interested in sustainable and less toxic menstrual products are driving changes in the industry. This shift has attracted growing attention from the media and lawmakers.
The Biden administration has taken legislative and regulatory action to address the use of PFAS in consumer products. In addition, these efforts seek to improve the safety and transparency of menstrual products.
Knix Settlement Details
Knix agreed to a $1.4 million marketing class-action lawsuit. The settlement aims to resolve claims that Knix’s period underwear contains dangerous PFAS. The settlement provided compensation to consumers who purchased Knix products between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. According to Topclassactions, this settlement is closed now.
In addition, the company has agreed to implement increased PFAS testing for two years. It will also remove references on its website to its products being PFAS-free, toxic chemical-free, or fluorine-free.
Customer Reviews on PFAS
Let’s move into some insightful customer reviews and discussions about PFAS:
- Reddit user IlexAquifolia shared insights from her friend at the EPA regarding PFAS. She clarified that PFAS can repel water. However, it’s not the only material that makes something waterproof. This raises questions about products like Gore-Tex. She also distinguished PFAS from polyurethane, noting their different chemical compositions.
- Another Reddit user named NotAnAd2 questioned whether polyurethane falls under the PFAS category. NotAnAd2 expressed uncertainty about materials using Gore-Tex and their transparency regarding PFAS content.
- Kamyta Shine contributed to the ongoing debate on PFAS in menstrual underwear. She highlighted brands that have been verified as PFAS-free. She recommended bamboo-based options, such as Dima pants from Sweetytime, for heavier days.
- SawWh3t commented a year ago about the presence of PFAS. It was mentioned that they can be found in everyday items such as makeup and food packaging. In addition, they are used in waterproof clothing and non-stick cookware. SawWh3t emphasized the challenge of avoiding these substances due to their widespread use.
Read also: GBRS Group Lawsuit
Bottom Line
The controversy surrounding Knix and PFAS highlights the importance of transparency and consumer trust in the menstrual product industry.
Consumers are increasingly demanding safer and more sustainable options. In addition, companies must ensure honest marketing to maintain credibility and protect public health.